|
KINDS |
|
| Proceeding from
understanding of a component as most generalised mechanism of productive thought
process, it is natural to suppose the presence of sub- stages. Each of a sub-stage
represents separately the specialised way of penetration into a problem and its
transformations (resolving). The gradation of these ways has the name 1, 2, 3 levels of
integrity. The first one - corresponds, as we think, to reflective - allocating.
The second one - corresponds to reflective (realising, understanding). The third one - to
reflective transforming way of penetration into problematical and conflict character of
experimental situation modelling vital conditions of creativity process realisation. Interaction of ways of penetration into a problem and its resolving also provides the most complete penetration into essence of the phenomenon. For all six components the concept of integrity inside a component defines a kind of a component. According to three levels of integrity in each of components is defined 3 kinds, which have the specific componental name and incorporated in frameworks of larger structural units (spheres, plans). Thus, the KIND is a concrete definition of a level of integrity in borders of a component. The concrete definition of function inside the kind is provided through association of tendencies. So, the kind, within the limits of any of plans is defined by two factors:
As the certain levels of integrity, kinds vary on the importance of their functioning for resolving and overcoming of problematical an conflict character of situations by individuals. In a situation curtailing (reductions) of verbal thinking the presence the staying kinds is diagnostic. A special value kinds have at realisation of the reflective theory in group-reflective technologies The description of kinds is in each concrete component. |
